ΑΡΧΑΙΑ ΙΘΩΜΗ ΚΑΛΗΜΕΡΑ ΙΕΡΗ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ

Μάκη  Σωτήρα των Ζουλού!!!!!!!!!!! Κάτι σε ρωτάει παρακάτω;;;;;

Τι να σας πω? δηλαδη, αυτο μονο τ’ ονειρευομουνα στην ζωη. δεν περιμενα πως θα γινοταν και πραγματικοτητα!

εη, σορρυ αςς, τωρα που εβγαλες και δοντια και φαινεσαι σαν γαηδουρι, εσυ που ξερεις αγγλικα, για εξηγησε τι σημαινει αυτο εδω. και προσεξε ποιο δικαστηριο τα λεει. ειναι σημαντικο για την εξελιξη που εχουν τα πραγματα.

“Mandamus is a ‘drastic remedy’ available in extraordinary circumstances only. In re: Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). A petitioner seeking the writ ‘must have no other adequate means to obtain the desired relief, and must show that the right to issuance is clear and indisputable.’ Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996), superseded in part on other grounds by 3d Cir. L.A.R. 24.1(c) (1997) […] However, mandamus may be warranted when a district court’s delay “is tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction” and rises to the level of a due process violation. Madden, 102 F.3d [74,] at 79.”

Quote from In Re: Alton Brown, No. 13-Civ-3558 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=
4011297053450684893, (3^rd Circ., November 12, 2013).

— Mitch Fatouros
Author
https://www.facebook.com/greek.mitch.1

………………………………………

United States Court of Appeals
for the
Third Circuit
IN RE DIMITRIOS “MITCH” FATOUROS
Plaintiff & Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY,
Respondent,
Emmanuel Lambrakis, et al.
Defendants,
____________________________________
From a Decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey,
No. 13-cv-_______-CEC – Honorable Claire E. Cecchi
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
DIMITRIOS “MITCH” FATOUROS, PRO SE
226 N. 17th Street
Bloomfield, NJ 07003
(201) 870-1130
MITCH FATOUROS PRESS (201) 870-1130
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I ISSUES…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..1
II JURISDICTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………1
III WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE DISTRICT COURT, OTHER PARTIES CANNOT
OR DO NOT HAVE TO BE SERVED WITH THIS PETITION…………………………………………………2
IV THE CHARACTERS IN THIS ARISTOPHANEAN COMEDY…………………………………………………3
V INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………………………………6
VI THE FRAUDULENT AND CRIMINAL NOVEMBER 18 FILING …………………………………………..11
VII AN EXHIBIT SUBMITTED BY DEFENDANT SORRAS DESCRIBED AS A CIVIL
ACTION IS A CRIMINAL INDICTMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS……………………………….14
VIII THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS ABSOLUTELY WARRANTED, PLAINTIFF
ATTEMPTED TO AVOID IT BY FILLING AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FIRST ……………………..15
IX THE ILLEGAL FILING IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ……………………………………………………18
X DEFENDANT SORRAS’S FILING IS CRIMINAL AND THE COURT MUST REPORT
THE FILING TO THE STATE’S AUTHORITIES………………………………………………………………..19
XI DEFENDANT SORRAS’S NOVEMBER 18 FILING FLAGRANTLY VIOLATED
FED. R. CIV. P. 11(A) AS IT WAS INTENDED TO FRUSTRATE JUSTICE…………………………….20
XII THE CRUX OF THIS PETITION WHERE IS THE JURISDICTION?………………………………………..22
XIII A MERITORIOUS ACTION ……………………………………………………………………………………….24

Mitch F greekmitch@gmail.com